On January 20, over forty elders and clergy took part in a Constructive Workshop. They shared personal views regarding the report of the Synod Administrative Review Committee.
On February 10, during our presbytery meeting, several workshop participants wrote these brief reflections:
Thank you for providing this opportunity to hear many viewpoints and experiences. It’s so helpful to make space for a longer discussion without the expectation of a vote at the end (after which we just “move on”). ~Holly Cameron
It helped me process the SARC report in a healthy and open way with others. ~Samantha Brewer
I thought Laurie did a good job leading, but sometimes I felt like an experience I had at a Packer game once – I was packed in between larger, exuberant fans, and I could not stand up to join the cheering, etc., because there was absolutely no room to stand up after they did. I hope the workshop was helpful to others. I am grateful the Presbytery – we – are working on those hard issues. ~Linda Martin
Your Staffing Process Advisory Team welcomes further reflection. Have things to say about the January workshop or the underlying Synod report? Suggestions for follow-through? Gifts you can offer?
Please address: firstname.lastname@example.org (Update 10/2018: This email address is no longer in use. Please direct any questions to the Albany Presbytery office at email@example.com.)
Thanks, and blessings!
Rev. Ted Wright
Ted Wright, Honorably Retired. Ted recently rejoined Albany Presbytery, having served previously as pastor at the Presbyterian United Church of Schaghticoke from 1978-1982. Since then he has pastored congregations in Langhorne, PA, and Gaithersburg, MD, and worked for PC(USA) World Mission in Zambia, Zimbabwe, Malawi and Mozambique.
The purpose of the Albany Presbytery Blog is to share information, tell stories, and promote the mission and ministry of the presbytery, synod and beyond. While the breadth of this medium is intentionally broad, it is not a platform for opinion pieces related to business coming before the presbytery unless designed as part of an initiative to provide a diversity of viewpoints at the direction of the presbytery. Exceptions to this policy may be brought to the presbytery officers who will determine appropriateness of submissions.